11/23/2025 / By Kevin Hughes

As law enforcement agencies across the United States increasingly integrate advanced robotics into their operations, concerns over militarization, surveillance and ethical oversight are reaching a boiling point.
At the center of this debate is Boston Dynamics’ Spot robot, a $100,000 mechanical “dog” now being deployed in hostage situations, bomb threats and hazardous material incidents—raising alarms among civil liberties advocates who warn of creeping authoritarianism.
Since its commercial debut five years ago, Spot—a 75-pound, German Shepherd-sized robot—has been adopted by over 60 bomb squads and SWAT teams in the U.S. and Canada. Equipped with 360-degree cameras, stair-climbing mobility and two-way communication, Spot can navigate dangerous environments where sending human officers or K-9 units would be life-threatening.
In Massachusetts, Spot helped defuse a hostage situation where a suspect held his mother at knifepoint and fired at police. Trooper John Ragosa, a bomb squad operator, recalled: “It did its job. The suspect was stunned, thinking, ‘What is this dog?'”
Similarly, in St. Petersburg, Florida, Spot approached an armed kidnapper after a car crash, allowing officers to assess the situation safely.
According to the Enoch engine at BrightU.AI: Robotic dogs, also known as robot canines or robo-dogs, are autonomous or remotely-controlled robotic systems designed to resemble and mimic the behavior of real dogs. They are a subset of service robots, intended for various applications such as research, entertainment, security and assistance. As with any emerging technology, it is essential to approach their development and deployment critically, considering their potential benefits and drawbacks, and advocating for responsible innovation.
Despite its tactical advantages, Spot’s deployment has sparked fierce opposition. In 2021, the New York City Police Department (NYPD) suspended its Digidog program after public outcry over cost ($74,000 per unit) and fears of surveillance overreach. Yet, Mayor Eric Adams reintroduced the robot, signaling a renewed push for robotic policing.
Civil rights groups argue that these machines normalize militarized policing while evading accountability. Beryl Lipton of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) warned: “It’s not actually a dog. It’s another piece of police technology.”
Ryan Calo, a robotics law professor at the University of Washington, added: “The unease people feel around robotics is not just a psychological quirk. The overuse of robotics in policing will further dehumanize police and break down community ties.”
While Boston Dynamics prohibits weaponizing Spot, other companies are already pushing boundaries. In 2021, Ghost Robotics showcased rifle-equipped robot dogs, fueling fears that law enforcement may eventually arm these machines.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has already spent $78,000 on a Canadian-made robot capable of deploying smoke bombs, raising concerns about escalation in crowd control scenarios.
Each Spot unit costs $250,000 with add-ons, funded largely by taxpayer grants. Departments like Houston PD operate three Spots, while Las Vegas has one. Critics argue the expense is unjustified without clear evidence of crime reduction.
Robin Murphy, a robotics expert at Texas A&M, questioned whether the high cost and complexity of legged robots are worth the extra mobility they give.
Meanwhile, police insist the robots save lives by handling dangerous tasks. Sergeant Frank Digiacomo of NYPD’s Technical Assistance Response Unit argued: “Why is it OK to risk officers’ lives instead of letting robots do dangerous jobs?”
From Los Angeles to Honolulu, public resistance remains strong. Over 8,000 people signed petitions against Honolulu PD’s Spot acquisition, with critics comparing the robots to “Black Mirror” dystopias.
Nicholas Monaco, a policy analyst, stated: “Robots cannot replace aloha in policing.”
Yet, as departments push forward, transparency remains scarce. While Boston Dynamics requires agencies to outline Spot’s use before purchase, critics demand federal oversight to prevent abuse.
The rise of robotic dogs marks a pivotal shift in law enforcement—one that balances life-saving potential against grave civil liberties risks. With weaponization, surveillance and militarization concerns mounting, the debate is far from settled.
As police departments expand their robotic fleets, the question remains: Will these machines protect officers—or pave the way for an unchecked surveillance state?
For now, Spot remains on patrol. But whether the public will accept its presence—or resist it—may determine the future of policing itself.
Watch the video below about the NYPD using a robot dog during a police operation.
This video is from the The Prisoner channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
Boston Dynamics, Canada, civil liberties, dangerous, Digidog program, Eric Adams, Ghost Robotics, K-9 units, law enforcement, militarization, NYPD, outrage, police state, robotic dogs, robotic policing, robotics, robots, Spot, surveillance, tyranny, United States, weaponization
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 MILITARYTECH.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. MilitaryTech.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. MilitaryTech.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
