06/24/2025 / By Ramon Tomey
U.S. President Donald Trump believes diplomacy in the form of a negotiated agreement can solve the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, not a prolonged military conflict.
Tammy Bruce, spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of State, conveyed the chief executive’s thoughts during a press conference on June 20. According to her, Trump has emphasized that earlier compromises could have spared Kyiv significant territorial and human losses.
“As I’ve mentioned before, during negotiations, things sometimes progress, things change. That’s the whole point of negotiations and conversations: You signal how long you’re generally willing to wait, but you also know if someone is serious,” Bruce told reporters. “At the same time, we’ve heard some very blunt comments by President Trump about [Russian] President [Vladimir] Putin.”
“That’s where we’ve landed at this point in comments from both the president and [the U.S.] Secretary of State [Marco Rubio] – that the only way this is going to end is for the two parties to meet and come to a conclusion and a decision, and some kind of an agreement.”
The real estate mogul’s stance marks a sharp departure from the Biden administration’s reliance on military aid and sanctions, signaling a renewed focus on backchannel negotiations – including talks in Turkey last month – after Ukraine abandoned diplomacy in 2022. It also aligns with Putin’s assertion that any peace deal must acknowledge the “realities on the ground” – a reference to Moscow’s claimed battlefield gains.
While Putin denies seeking unconditional surrender, he warned that Ukraine’s negotiating position weakens with time. His message was clear: The war has strategically tipped in Moscow’s favor, and Kyiv would be better off negotiating now than later.
Framing Trump’s strategy as pragmatic, Bruce stressed that Washington remains Ukraine’s biggest supporter. Shen nevertheless acknowledged the complexities of peace talks, noting that Trump’s direct engagement has been ongoing for months.
Historical context underscores the urgency of these efforts. The war, now in its third year, has exacted a staggering toll – tens of thousands dead, millions displaced and economies around the globe disrupted. At home, U.S. voters are increasingly questioning unlimited military aid to Ukraine while domestic crises persist.
Trump’s push for talks, as conveyed by Bruce, reflects this shifting sentiment. This ironically contrasts with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s insistence on full Russian withdrawal, a demand now at odds with military realities. (Related: Ukraine on the brink: Can Trump’s pragmatism or Zelensky’s defiance save a shattered nation?)
The State Department spokeswoman also hinted at strategic patience. “We’re not going to listen to what [Russia] says – we’re going to watch what they do,” she said, suggesting the administration is prioritizing actions over rhetoric.
The path to peace is fraught, but Trump’s gamble is clear: ending the war through dialogue, not destruction. Whether this gamble pays off hinges on whether Kyiv and Moscow can reconcile their irreconcilable demands.
Watch Gerald Celente discussing geopolitical tensions and the Russia-Ukraine war in this excerpt from “Decentralize TV.”
This video is from the Brighteon Highlights channel on Brighteon.com.
Trump administration considers ABANDONING Ukraine peace talks if no progress is made.
Rubio says Ukraine peace talks doomed without Trump and Putin as leaders push for direct meeting.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
big government, chaos, collapse, dangerous, department of state, diplomacy, Donald Trump, foreign relations, national security, negotiated agreement, peace talks, Russia, Russia-Ukraine war, Tammy Bruce, Ukraine, violence, Vladimir Putin, White House, WWIII
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 MILITARYTECH.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. MilitaryTech.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. MilitaryTech.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.