07/23/2024 / By S.D. Wells
Immediately after every mass shooting, fake news jumps to the podium to declare it was a “lone shooter” with a “long gun.” No matter how many bullets are fired, from how many directions, and no matter what intel, equipment, planning, recon and technology was involved, the narrative stays the same from day one. Plus, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Central Intelligence Agency never ever have any security footage from mass shootings. Why? Is that all just too difficult for the 3-stooges-like FBI to handle?
Well, it’s supposedly not too much for a “lone gunman” who’s twenty years old and can’t shoot a watermelon with a rifle from 100 yards away. They’re saying Thomas Matthew Crooks worked alone to try to murder former President Donald Trump, but did he? If he was working alone, why did he have drones, multiple ladders, multiple encrypted cell phones and a homemade IED with a detonator (but he supposedly did not do any research on how to construct a bomb)?
The bigger question looms: Why didn’t Trump’s security teams fly their own drones over the fairgrounds before and during the event? That would have spotted the “lone shooter” on the roof, spotted his drone flying over beforehand, and been proof to the world (and the liberal conspiracy theorists) that the assassination attempt was not “staged,” or at least not by Trump’s side.
It’s now becoming quite obvious that the Deep State planned Trump’s assassination, and that Crooks did NOT work alone, but more as the patsy who himself was assassinated for his participation. If Crooks was too incompetent to build his own improvised explosive device, according to the FBI’s research, then how did he get it? Also, why didn’t Crooks rig his drone to drop the bomb on Trump, just to be sure he finished the “job?” Maybe there’s a reason they’re called “secret service,” because there’s much more to this story to be told, that’s all being covered up.
Why didn’t the Secret Service have their own drones for aerial security footage? Why were there absolutely ZERO security cameras set up and running before and during the Trump speech? Why were the Secret Service afraid to stand on a slightly slanted rooftop, when another group of security officials had no problem doing the same, on an even more slanted roof, that still wasn’t even dangerous, compared to what most roofers function atop?
Why is the FBI stonewalling Freedom of Information Act requests? What do they have to hide? Shouldn’t every Secret Service employee and other hired “help” be tried for conspiracy to commit murder, since there is so much evidence now that all of these “lapses” in security are more like complacency in a well-drafted plan to allow a shooter to take several pot shots at Trump, and even prepare with drone footage, homemade explosives, encrypted cell phones and accounts overseas, equipment he couldn’t carry alone, and access to buildings where secret service were inside eating donuts and drinking coffee?
The number one tell-tale sign that this whole assassination attempt was a set-up by the Deep State is that Director of the Secret Service Kimberly Cheatle claims that the reason her own anti-sniper snipers weren’t on the roof of the barn is because she didn’t want them to fall off and get hurt. Take one look at that roof and you will see it’s barely slanted at all. Big lie.
The other tell-tale sign is the puts investors placed against Trump assets and Rumble, knowing their values would tumble if Trump got killed, and they would make billions of dollars. Follow the bouncing ball folks.
Don’t forget to tune your apocalypse dial to Preparedness.news for updates on real news about the surviving and thriving what the communists in D.C. have planned for Trump and the rest of us next.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
active shooter, assassination attempt, big government, conspiracy, corruption, crooks, deception, deep state, Donald Trump, drones, FBI corruption, lone shooter, national security, police state, rational, Secret Service, skeptics, Thomas Matthew Crooks, traitors, treason, Twisted, weapons technology
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 MILITARYTECH.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. MilitaryTech.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. MilitaryTech.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.